Speech given at the last class of Classical Rhetoric May 27, 2026.

Every individual desires power, yet few ask what power reveals. For power does not so much corrupt as it uncovers; and when restraint is removed, what is uncovered is often monstrous. Man, left to himself, moves from corruption to excess, from excess to the loss of restraint, and from the loss of restraint to tyranny. Nero stands as the fullest embodiment of this corruption. He is not just another emperor of the past, but also a mirror of what man becomes when he casts off all restraint.

Nero rose to power not as a monster, but as a man entrusted with rule. At first, he was bound by blood to his family, by duty to his state, and by expectation of justice. However, even in his rise, the seeds of corruption were sown. It was during the early years of his rule that the direction of his reign became clear: not for justice, nor for order, but for fear and spectacle. Those who were closest to him suffered the most severely.

High expectations were set when Nero ascended the imperial throne. Adopted by the Emperor Claudius, he inherited not only authority but the burden of ruling the greatest empire of the ancient world at a young age. When he first sat on the imperial throne, Rome wished for moderation. At first, it seemed he would rule that way. His early reign appeared guided by wiser counselors, and it seemed hopeful that the excess of former rulers would be controlled.

Yet corruption rarely appears in its final form. It begins in smaller disorders of desire and character. Nero increasingly sought admiration over wisdom, spectacle over discipline, and personal gratification over duty. Those nearest to him—his mother, his advisors, even the Roman people themselves—became obstacles whenever they ceased to support his ambition.

To understand Nero fully, one must trace the stages of his descent: the violation of nature, the corruption of rule, the disintegration of reason, and finally the surrender of the soul to evil itself.

What do children owe to their parents? Nero was to love and honor his mother, but instead, he sent assassins to kill her. When Nero shed his mother’s blood, he cast aside not only restraint but nature itself. Was this to be expected? Nero was the offspring of a corrupt family. His mother married her uncle Claudius, and Nero himself later married his step-sister. Agrippina herself was willing to do what it took to place Nero on the throne. Born into a corrupt, incestuous family, should we even be surprised by his actions? Suetonius, in The Twelve Caesars, preserves the unfavorable traditions that gathered around Nero’s birth and upbringing, in which rumor and judgment already marked him with suspicion.

Yet even the most expected things can be among the corrupt and wrong. Even now, mankind recoils from the man who murders the very one he is bound to honor. There is no lenience to be had for a matricidal ruler. He who destroys what he is bound to love proves himself monstrous; Nero destroyed those bound to him by blood.

What is a ruler’s purpose? A ruler is meant to measure a people toward justice for their own benefit. Nero became, for all who succeeded him, the embodiment of how power should not be wielded.

A century after Nero’s corruptive rule, the philosopher-emperor Marcus Aurelius sat in his military tent, writing a warning to himself. He knew how easily the throne could corrupt a man. He wrote: “Take care that you are not made into a Caesar, that you are not dyed with this dye; for such things happen. Keep yourself then simple, good, pure, serious, free from affectation, a friend of justice, a worshipper of the gods, kind, affectionate, strenuous in all proper acts.” (Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 6.30)

Nero is the ultimate historical example of a ruler who was “dyed” by absolute power and vanity. Nero sought glory at the expense of duty, and ruin followed. Nero would rather be praised than rule justly.

A ruler governed by suspicion treats the innocent as enemies; so governed, he spared none. Where paranoia reigns, innocence is no defense; under him, it became no refuge. He who cannot endure opposition will destroy it, and so opposition itself became peril.

This corruption of mind did not remain abstract. Even those once closest to him fell beneath his shadow. Seneca, once his teacher and counselor, was forced to die by his own hand, not for guilt proven, but for fear imagined. The empire began to breathe under accusation rather than justice, where loyalty could not protect, and silence could not save.

Thus, Nero’s suspicion hardened into paranoia, and paranoia into violence. He could not endure a voice against him, he could not endure a thought against him, he could not endure a man against him; therefore, he silenced them all.

No man leaps into cruelty at once. Evil enters by degrees. Nero justified evil, then permitted it, and finally committed it openly. To justify evil is to redefine it; to permit evil is to grow accustomed to it; but to commit evil continually is to become transformed by it.

Pride destroys a man’s sense of measure and restraint. Nero, blinded by vanity and power, no longer recognized the limits of law, nature, or conscience. When Rome burned, spectacle mattered more to Nero than the suffering, and accusation more than truth. Innocent Christian men were condemned so that one ruler might escape.

Yet some may object, “If Nero was raised among corruption, manipulation, incest, and political violence, then he was formed by circumstances beyond his control.” Yet circumstances do not compel men to embrace corruption. Many great leaders have inherited corruption from previous rulers and have not been overcome by it. If circumstance alone creates tyrants, then no man may be judged; yet history praises those who resisted corruption and condemns those who surrender to it. A tyrant is shaped chiefly by character; Nero would be a tyrant even alone.

Nero is not unique; he is what any man becomes when restraint is cast aside. Nero was not merely a bad ruler but a mirror of unchecked human corruption; therefore, his life stands as a cautionary tale. Epictetus says, “But I aspire to be the purple stripe, that is, the garments brilliant hem. However small a part it may be, it can still manage to make the garment as a whole attractive.” (Epictetus, Discourses 1.18) Nero strove to be this purple hem through spectacle and performance. Yet in striving to become the purple hem, Nero instead became the black stain that defiled the garment.

Therefore, let Nero’s reign stand as a warning to you. For the corruption that consumed Nero is not confined to emperors, nor to Rome, nor to the ancient world. The same pride, vanity, and desire for power dwell within the human heart. A man need not sit upon a throne to become a tyrant; he need only to put himself above truth, justice, and restraint.

Nero fell because he first ruled himself so poorly. So too every society decays when men abandon discipline, virtue, and moral law. Therefore judge Nero rightly—but do not judge him only. Look also to yourselves, lest the corruption condemned in history be permitted in your own hearts.

Back to Home →